<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suggestions for &#8220;clustering&#8221; WordPress MU servers?  Or mirroring servers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/2009/01/22/suggestions-for-clustering-wordpress-mu-servers-or-mirroring-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/2009/01/22/suggestions-for-clustering-wordpress-mu-servers-or-mirroring-servers/</link>
	<description>A blog about a blog (site)... a view inside a WordPress MU installation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon,  1 Feb 2010 23:02:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Behind The Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upgrading to WordPress MU 2.7.1&#8230; step by step</title>
		<link>http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/2009/01/22/suggestions-for-clustering-wordpress-mu-servers-or-mirroring-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind The Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upgrading to WordPress MU 2.7.1&#8230; step by step</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/?p=72#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>[...] had to wait for WordPress MU 2.7 to become available at the end of January and then was caught up in working on how to make a redundant WPMU server for failover purposes (not entirely there yet, but getting close). Well&#8230; then there was this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had to wait for WordPress MU 2.7 to become available at the end of January and then was caught up in working on how to make a redundant WPMU server for failover purposes (not entirely there yet, but getting close). Well&#8230; then there was this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea_R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/2009/01/22/suggestions-for-clustering-wordpress-mu-servers-or-mirroring-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea_R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/?p=72#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go with #2. Option #1 really is more for scaling large sites, not replicating in case of failure. :)

I&#039;m sure you haven&#039;t found it becasue it hasn&#039;t been discussed. :D At least not in terms of being able to get the site back up quickly. Most smaller sites rely on (hopefully) offsite backups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go with #2. Option #1 really is more for scaling large sites, not replicating in case of failure. <img src='http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you haven&#8217;t found it becasue it hasn&#8217;t been discussed. <img src='http://blogs.voxeo.com/behindtheblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  At least not in terms of being able to get the site back up quickly. Most smaller sites rely on (hopefully) offsite backups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
