<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SPITing in your general direction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.voxeo.com/speakingofstandards/2007/12/08/spiting-in-your-general-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.voxeo.com/speakingofstandards/2007/12/08/spiting-in-your-general-direction/</link>
	<description>A Voxeo view on industry standards...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:30:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan York</title>
		<link>http://blogs.voxeo.com/speakingofstandards/2007/12/08/spiting-in-your-general-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.voxeo.com/speakingofstandards/2007/12/08/spiting-in-your-general-direction/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>RJ,

And this post is a great example of why &quot;SPIT&quot; gets so much play in the media... with what other topic can you create such a great headline?

I&#039;ll note to readers that the particular draft presented by Dan Wing can be found at:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-wing-sipping-spam-score/  

The slides that Dan Wing presented can be found at:

  http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/sipping-4.ppt

In the discussion within the SIPPING meeting, it was clear that there was not support at the moment for this specific proposal.  I do hope, though, that the IETF can come up with a plan for at least specifying the header to be used.  No such effort was done in the email world and as a result each different email anti-spam tool uses its own headers and this makes enabling support in email clients a royal pain in the neck.  We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RJ,</p>
<p>And this post is a great example of why &#8220;SPIT&#8221; gets so much play in the media&#8230; with what other topic can you create such a great headline?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll note to readers that the particular draft presented by Dan Wing can be found at:</p>
<p>  <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-wing-sipping-spam-score/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-wing-sipping-spam-score/</a>  </p>
<p>The slides that Dan Wing presented can be found at:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/sipping-4.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/sipping-4.ppt</a></p>
<p>In the discussion within the SIPPING meeting, it was clear that there was not support at the moment for this specific proposal.  I do hope, though, that the IETF can come up with a plan for at least specifying the header to be used.  No such effort was done in the email world and as a result each different email anti-spam tool uses its own headers and this makes enabling support in email clients a royal pain in the neck.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
