Unified Self-Service: One application does NOT mean only ONE user interface

May 14th, 2010 by Dan York

unifiedselfserviceshadow.jpgRecently when I was discussing the whole concept of “Unified Self-Service” with someone, they asked me this:

I get the ROI benefits of “one application, many channels”, but why would I want the same user interface across all the different channels? Wouldn’t that lead to a poor user experience on some of the channels?

I paused and realized that clearly I needed some more caffeine or something, as I’d obviously not been clear in what I was saying. I went on to explain that:

One application DEFINITELY does not mean only ONE user interface!

Very definitely NOT. This isn’t Highlander, after all. The whole point of Unified Self-Service is that you can interact with customers across multiple channels using:

  • one application
  • one development environment / tool
  • one set of logs
  • one set of analytics
  • one team of developers

Instead of having 6 different teams of developers creating apps for each channel, using six different development tools, six different services, six different analytics packages, etc…. instead you can have one combined set of tools.

The user experience, however, can be completely different between the channels. For example, consider an app providing voice, IM, SMS, Twitter and mobile web:

  • With the voice channel in a typical IVR scenario you might want to greet the caller with “Thank you for calling” and then guide them through a typical set of menus.
  • Over in text-based channels like IM, SMS or Twitter, you might instead want to ask only a single question – or even better just start processing the input sent by the user in the initial message. (And for Twitter and SMS you have to worry about size limits or splitting messages.)
  • For the mobile web, you may have a web page with graphics that correspond to choices similar to what you had in the voice IVR, but perhaps without a menu of options, i.e. all presented on the main screen.

All of these are design decisions you make while creating your application… you certainly could create an app with a nearly identical user interface across channels… and if done really well that might work. Or you can tweak the interface for each channel to interact with customers in the most appropriate ways for those channels. Whatever you do the tools you use to create that app should help you in creating the best customer experience possible. Our tools certainly do. :-)

If you’d like to learn more about creating multi-channel applications, you can:


Related posts:

  1. Building Unified Self-Service Apps Just Got Easier with VoiceObjects On-Demand
  2. What is Unified Self-Service?
  3. Want a case study of Unified Self-Service? How about T-Mobile?

Want to learn how Voxeo can help unlock your communications and deliver a better customer experience? Please contact us!

If you found this post interesting or helpful, please consider either subscribing via RSS, becoming a fan on Facebook, or following us on Twitter.


One Response to “Unified Self-Service: One application does NOT mean only ONE user interface”

  1. Disruptive Conversations Says:

    Webinar tomorrow – Unified Self-Service – one app for voice, SMS, IM, web and Twitter…

    Are you interested in how you can service customer requests across all the different communication channels they might use? Do you want to give your customers a choice in the way they interact with you? Rather than requiring them to……

Leave a Reply

Please note: By submitting a comment you agree to comply with our Comment Policy. We welcome all comments, positive or negative, but do reserve the right to remove all or part of blog comments that do not comply with our policy.

Additionally, the first time you leave a comment on this blog, it will be held for moderation. After that first comment has been approved, future comments will be posted without delay.

Additional comments powered by BackType